Talking Inclusion Ep.13 - A Mindset Problem
an inclusive education for children and young people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD)
Tag Results
Human Rights
Survey about the proposed social care reforms and our human rights
How do the proposed social care reforms in England and Wales affect your human rights? New survey from NDTi.
Rights based analysis of proposed social care reforms
NDTi is pleased to be working in partnership with the British Institute of Human Rights (BIHR) to carry out a rights-based analysis of the proposed adult social care reforms in England, Scotland and Wales.
Protect Our Human Rights
On global Human Rights Day, as the UK joins the international Summit for Democracy, NDTi stands with over 150 groups across the UK to urge the Prime Minister to take action to secure our Human Rights Act
Blog: Taking Responsibility
It’s time to take responsibility. Jane Friswell and Bill Love reflect on placements, secure settings and failing people.
NDTi Joins the British Institute of Human Rights in concerns over Emergency Powers in Scotland
NDTi Joins the British Institute of Human Rights in concerns over Emergency Powers in Scotland
Sexuality and Relationships- My Rights Charter
The charter draws on the findings from two research projects. The first carried out by the Tizard Centre and the second by NDTi and My Life My Choice.
NDTi joins Disabilities Rights UK in Supporting the rights of disabled people during COVID-19
Covid 19 and the rights of disabled people. Statement published on https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2020/april/covid-19-and-rights-disabled-people
Human Rights in Advocacy
Katrin McEntee, from The British Institute of Human Rights, discusses why Human Rights needs to be used in Advocacy and how it can be done.
Avoiding a dangerous precedent for the application of the Mental Capacity Act
A recent letter from Glynis Murphy, published in Guardian, started a flurry of discussion in the NDTi research team office. It's written in response to the Guardian's report of Justice Robert's ruling in the case of JB, a young man with autism and cognitive impairment who wants the opportunity to develop a sexual relationship.